{"id":120709,"date":"2026-09-11T21:52:46","date_gmt":"2026-09-11T19:52:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/publikasjoner\/a-pm10-intercomparison-exercise-in-norway\/"},"modified":"2026-09-11T21:52:46","modified_gmt":"2026-09-11T19:52:46","slug":"a-pm10-intercomparison-exercise-in-norway","status":"publish","type":"nva_publication","link":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/publications\/a-pm10-intercomparison-exercise-in-norway\/","title":{"rendered":"A PM10 intercomparison exercise in Norway."},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This report presents the results from a PM10 field intercomparison exercise performed in Norway. The exercise included several sampelrs and automatic monitors as candidate instruments as well as the Andersen high volume and Kleinfilterger\u00e1t (KFG \/ Low volume) samplers as reference instruments. The exercise was performed according to the European standard EN12341.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_searchwp_excluded":"","_id":"","_status":"PUBLISHED","_sync_date":"2026-09-11 15:04:00","footnotes":""},"nva_tax_category":[1095],"class_list":["post-120709","nva_publication","type-nva_publication","status-publish","hentry","nva_tax_category-report"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/nva_publication\/120709","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/nva_publication"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/nva_publication"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/nva_publication\/120709\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=120709"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"nva_tax_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/nva_tax_category?post=120709"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}