{"id":84594,"date":"2026-06-04T14:18:21","date_gmt":"2026-06-04T12:18:21","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2026-06-26T13:27:46","modified_gmt":"2026-06-26T11:27:46","slug":"0198cc3d07f5-6c818cd9-a7c0-40ff-a853-5bc65377afc6","status":"publish","type":"nva_publication","link":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/publications\/0198cc3d07f5-6c818cd9-a7c0-40ff-a853-5bc65377afc6\/","title":{"rendered":"Do simple screening criteria capture a chemical\u2019s potential for adverse effects in remote regions?"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_searchwp_excluded":"","_id":"","_status":"PUBLISHED","_sync_date":"2026-06-26 13:13:08","footnotes":""},"nva_tax_category":[985],"class_list":["post-84594","nva_publication","type-nva_publication","status-publish","hentry","nva_tax_category-poster"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/nva_publication\/84594","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/nva_publication"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/nva_publication"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/nva_publication\/84594\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":84595,"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/nva_publication\/84594\/revisions\/84595"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=84594"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"nva_tax_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/nva_tax_category?post=84594"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}