{"id":11761,"date":"2020-09-07T12:03:13","date_gmt":"2020-09-07T10:03:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/?p=11761"},"modified":"2020-09-07T12:05:39","modified_gmt":"2020-09-07T10:05:39","slug":"the-drought-of-2018-stopped-europes-natural-co2-uptake","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/2020\/09\/the-drought-of-2018-stopped-europes-natural-co2-uptake\/","title":{"rendered":"The drought of 2018 stopped Europe\u2019s natural CO<sub>2<\/sub> uptake"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cThe extensive heatwave and drought in 2018 had a negative impact on vegetation across Western and Northern Europe. This means that over the year, there was no uptake of CO<sub>2<\/sub> from the atmosphere by vegetation, which we would normally expect to see\u201d, explains Dr. Rona Thompson. Thompson is a senior scientist at NILU \u2013 Norwegian Institute for Air Research and first author of a <a href=\"https:\/\/royalsocietypublishing.org\/doi\/10.1098\/rstb.2019.0512\">recently published article<\/a> in a <a href=\"https:\/\/royalsocietypublishing.org\/toc\/rstb\/375\/1810\">special issue of Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B<\/a>. The issue focuses on the effects of the 2018 drought using data from ICOS (see fact box below).<\/p>\n<h2>CO<sub>2<\/sub> sink dries out<\/h2>\n<p>The land biosphere takes up CO<sub>2<\/sub> from the atmosphere through photosynthesis and releases it again through respiration. Presently in Europe, the uptake (also known as primary productivity) slightly outweighs the release, resulting in a sink of CO<sub>2<\/sub> from the atmosphere. This sink partially (6%) offsets the amount of CO<sub>2<\/sub> emitted in Europe by human activities, especially fossil fuels. The difference between the primary production and the total respiration is known as the Net Ecosystem Exchange, or NEE. Positive NEE indicates CO<sub>2<\/sub> going from the land biosphere into the atmosphere, while negative NEE means that the CO<sub>2<\/sub> is going from the atmosphere into the land biosphere.<\/p>\n<p>During the spring of 2018, northern Europe generally experienced good growing conditions, resulting in more negative NEE. Or, in other words, enhanced CO<sub>2<\/sub> uptake.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAt that time, there was still a lot of water in the soil\u201d, says Thompson. \u201cWith more light and warmer temperatures, vegetation benefited and was able to take up more CO<sub>2<\/sub> than normal.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>By the end of spring, higher temperatures and the lack of precipitation started to negatively affect vegetation and CO<sub>2<\/sub> uptake. The record long drought period resulted in NEE being close to zero for Western and Northern Europe for 2018. This in contrast to the past 10 years, when annual NEE has always been negative.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe implications of this are that Europe\u2019s natural CO<sub>2<\/sub> sink, which helps offset some of our CO<sub>2<\/sub> emissions from fossil fuels, is fragile\u201d, says Thompson. \u201cClimate models predict that summer droughts will become more likely, meaning that Europe\u2019s land biosphere sink may get smaller or even eventually disappear in the future.\u201d<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_11748\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-11748\" style=\"width: 600px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-11748 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/nilu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/20180809_westerneuropedrought_noaa.jpg\" alt=\"Satellite picture of Europe summer 2018\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" srcset=\"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/20180809_westerneuropedrought_noaa.jpg 600w, https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/20180809_westerneuropedrought_noaa-300x169.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-11748\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photos taken by NOAA-20 satellite&#8217;s VIIRS instrument on 30 June and 6 August 2018 show the browning of western Europe after several weeks of hot, dry weather. Figure courtesy of NOAA,<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nesdis.noaa.gov\/content\/record-summer-heat-bakes-europe\"> https:\/\/www.nesdis.noaa.gov\/content\/record-summer-heat-bakes-europe<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>Quantification by atmospheric inversion models<\/h2>\n<p>Thompson and her co-authors have used five different regional atmospheric inversion models to quantify the effect of the drought period on NEE.<\/p>\n<p>They looked at variations of CO<sub>2<\/sub> in the atmosphere. Then, with an atmospheric transport model, they tried to model these variations using estimates of CO<sub>2<\/sub> fluxes, in particular NEE from land biosphere models. They then looked at the mismatch between their modelled CO<sub>2<\/sub> and CO<sub>2<\/sub> observations, and used this mismatch in a statistical optimization to improve the original NEE estimates.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe used atmospheric CO<sub>2<\/sub> observations from 48 sites across Europe, to constrain NEE\u201d, Thompson explains. \u201cWe found that the five different inversion models were able to consistently detect the change in NEE in 2018.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Their models showed that in temperate Europe, annual NEE was more positive (less CO<sub>2<\/sub> uptake) in 2018 compared to the 10-year mean, resulting in no net CO<sub>2<\/sub> uptake that year. They found a similar result also for northern Europe, even though the vegetation actually benefited from warmer temperatures during the spring of 2018.<\/p>\n<p>Thompson et al. conclude their article with pointing out that absolute NEE values from atmospheric inversion models remain uncertain. To achieve better results, they would need more exact fossil fuel emission estimates, constraints on boundary conditions \u2013 and a well-maintained high-density atmospheric observation network.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cThe extensive heatwave and drought in 2018 had a negative impact on vegetation across Western and Northern Europe. This means that over the year, there was no uptake of CO2 from the atmosphere by vegetation, which we would normally expect to see\u201d, explains Dr. Rona Thompson. Thompson is a senior scientist at NILU \u2013 Norwegian [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":11751,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_searchwp_excluded":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11761","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-newsarchive"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11761","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11761"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11761\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11793,"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11761\/revisions\/11793"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11751"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11761"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11761"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nilu.gnist.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11761"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}